A Cheap way to win an argument

Roger Ebert has once again made a pronouncement that video games cannot ever be art. He is wrong, and his manner of defending his contentious belief is extremely irritating. Essentially, he relies on dismissing his opponent’s definitions of ‘art’, while doggedly using his very narrow criteria to label games as not-art. It’s really perplexing that he can disqualify a whole medium because of its interactivity. The ability to become immersed in a story and feel the emotions that the protagonist and the other characters are experiencing is a hallmark of art.

It is really a stupid argument at the end of it, because there can never be a cut and dry, point by point definition of ‘art’. If it moves you, if it affects you, and you want to call it art,  it is art. Why waste time bickering? Go do something that makes you feel like a part of something bigger.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s